To give a quick sketch of Trujillo’s bloody and oppressive reign, one need not look further than the Parsley Massacre (1937), in which Trujillo’s secret police murdered some 30,000 Haitians. Race (specifically blackness as undesirable), therefore, became something that permeated the social consciousness of Dominicans. Best concerns himself primarily with the rise of “the history of the black Atlantic… through loss [which] can in turn be sustained only through more tales of its loss” (458) and, moreover, the historical framework of the black Atlantic narrative that provides a progression that “forged a society from a human catastrophe” (457). Nonetheless, the historical representation of the undesirability of blackness in the Dominican Republic is a central concern in Díaz’s work, since slavery has a history outside of the Atlantic slave trade that is significant and irreconcilable. Belicia, Oscar’s mother, “was born black,” a terrible curse in its own right for Dominican children (Diaz 248) -- “and not just any kind of black. But black black... and no amount of fancy Dominican racial legerdemain was going to obscure the fact. That’s the kind of culture I belong to: people took their child’s black complexion as an ill omen” (Diaz 248). Because of her blackness, she was sold as a child menial into various abusive foster homes at an early age. As a result of this narrative, I find one of the central questions with which Best concerns himself to be especially applicable to Díaz’s novel. Best asks: “Through what process has it become possible to claim the lives and efforts of history’s defeated as ours either to redeem or to redress?” (454). The Cabrals, following “the bad thing” (Díaz 227) Abelard Cabral said about Trujillo during a drunken night at a bar with some of El Jefe’s thugs, are defeated and cursed indefinitely, leading to an irredeemable future. Interestingly, the moment that the fukú arises during Abelard’s imprisonment is the same moment that Belicia is born, further connecting blackness with accursedness.
Conversely, Best’s claims, echoing the arguments of David Scott, that with such historically barred possibilities, “we have only our present conjuncture, only our current predicament” (Best 456), controvert the historical past (of the curse) that Oscar feels to be central to his being, which the narrator, Yunior, also slowly recognizes to be an inescapable truth. Yunior narrates: “On the outside, Oscar simply looked tired… Inside, he was in a world of hurt… He was turning into the worst kind of human on the planet… He didn’t want this future but he couldn’t see how it could be avoided, couldn’t figure his way out of it. Fukú. The Darkness.” (Díaz 268). History, then, becomes something for the Cabrals that is particularly irredeemable through accursedness, but also inextricably linked to their fate. Oscar’s sister, Lola, on one of her last intimate nights with Yunior, claims: “Ten Million Trujillos is all we are” (Díaz 324). Thus, she retroactively casts the curse not only on her immediate family, but on the diaspora of all Dominicans affected by Trujillo’s reign. In fact, in a nerdy (yet oddly applicable) reference to Tolkien, Yunior says, “Sauron’s evil was taken by ‘a great wind’ and neatly ‘blown away,’ with no lasting consequences to our heroes; but Trujillo was too powerful, too toxic a radiation to be dispelled so easily. Even after death his evil lingered” (Díaz 156). The adverse effects of Trujillo’s policies consequently amplify the results of the fukú upon the Cabrals, while simultaneously connecting the characters to their ancestral past.
2 comments:
It's interesting bringing the idea of "Fuku" into orbit with Best's wager of an "irredeemable past." Indeed, in my hand, "Fuku" might be spelt 'evil' as might be 'trauma'. So too might 'history' be taken into this repetition of variations, I suppose. Although, by combining notions of history and "accursedness," I wonder how the residue of 30,000 deaths, how 30,000 ghosts might impose either a 'presentness of the historical' which would imply, if not a desire for redemption as a form of exorcism, then at least a desire to reconcile with the past; or, if the presentness of evil would inspire a will to forget, to occlude, to sever (which, through your narrative summary, seems to swing toward psychosis). Of course, this inquiry can only stand on the presupposition that the curse cannot be undone––about which I could be wrong, and it's entirely possible that psychosis, or a lesser neurosis, is the text's condition of historical transmission, the semblance of which appears to be Oscar himself.
Zach! So happy to see someone working with Díaz; Brief Wondrous Life is such a wonderfully rich narrative.
I really like that you abstain from doing something I've seen in other analyses of BWL -- which is to immediately make the assumption of analyzing fukú as literary allusion, transparent metaphor, or an abstract "symbol" for national trauma. I think it's much more productive to treat fukú the way it is theorized in the book -- as a real and lasting legacy of collective trauma, and as a supernatural possibility that characters struggle to comprehend and oscillate over whether or not they believe in its existence as an actual force of fortune in their lives.
So if fukú is a force of destiny in characters' lives, this opens up a lot of interesting connections to Best and a lot of questions. It would be interesting to think about fukú in relationship to Morrison's concept of rememory, another physical manifestation of the past that is also part of a collective memory of trauma. Some other questions to think about: does Díaz expand fukú to encompass not only Trujillo's legacy but also a more (historically) far reaching history of racial discrimination and self-hatred? If fukú is indeed so strong a force as to write the destinies of our characters, are we then reading a narrative that was already foretold? Is that significant? How does fukú as a manifestation of a Dominican past intersect with its comparisons and connections to science fiction media? How might you explore fukú as a national/cultural legacy, but a legacy explored through a narrative of family lineage and inheritance? Is Díaz's text an example of Dillon's "Secret History"?
Post a Comment